Skip to Content


Criminal illegal aliens' deportation cases dropped, but *your* every move is tracked

Two completely separate stories, but they add up to complete confusion.  First, Homland Security is systematically against illegals even if they have prior convictions.  Huh?  So even the fact that it is their job to catch and deport those who have entered the U.S. illegally, they choose not to?  Not even if they are convicted criminals?

In a remarkable move that has stunned the legal profession, the Department of Homeland Security is systematically dismissing pending deportation cases against illegal aliens, even when the offenders have been previously convicted of crimes in the U.S.

The government agency charged with keeping America safe quietly began about a month ago, according to a story in Texas’s largest newspaper. The effort began in Houston and has baffled local immigration attorneys who say the government dismissed their clients’ deportation even when expulsion was virtually guaranteed. “It was absolutely fantastic,” said one lawyer who had three cases dismissed this week.

But that won't stop government agencies from of the Constitution with citizens though.  Apparently it is just fine to bug and track anyone who is foolish enough to park in their own driveway.  Fourth Amendment?  Search warrant?  Who needs 'em.

Government agents can sneak onto your property in the middle of the night, put a GPS device on the bottom of your car and keep track of everywhere you go. This doesn't violate your Fourth Amendment rights, because you do not have any reasonable expectation of privacy in your own driveway - and no reasonable expectation that the government isn't tracking your movements.

That is the bizarre - and scary - rule that now applies in California and eight other Western states. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, which covers this vast jurisdiction, recently decided the government can monitor you in this way virtually anytime it wants - with no need for a search warrant.

It's all backwards and upside down, I tell you. All backwards and upside down.

Expansion of Islam in America and the Ground Zero mosque

Sent to me by different sources, the information and video below are both related and very interesting.  Read it, watch it, and come to your own conclusions.

Islam is not a religion, nor is it a cult. In its fullest form, it is a complete, total, 100% system of life.  Islam has religious, legal, political, economic, social, and military components. The religious component is a beard for all of the other components. Islamization begins when there are sufficient Muslims in a country to agitate for their religious privileges.  When politically correct, tolerant, and culturally diverse societies agree to Muslim demands for their religious privileges, some of  the other components tend to creep in as well.


Here's how it works:

Chuck Norris: Obama's U.S. Assassination Program (Part 1)

Part 2 of this editorial can now be found .


It all comes down to one basic verb. Can you find it in the following paragraph?

reads, "By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, including section 1 of the International Organizations Immunities Act (22 U.S.C. 288), and in order to extend the appropriate privileges, exemptions, and immunities to the International Criminal Police Organization (Interpol)…"

There's the magic verb: "to extend!"

As I wrote in any earlier column on Interpol, is it also just coincidental that Interpol is exempt from typical American search and seizure laws?

Anyone still not connecting the dots?

writes about Obama's U.S. assassination program.  And here I was thinking UAVs being used for was bad.

Sound too conspiratorial to be true? Like the cover-up ops of spy novels? Well, it's reality. And it is possibly the most bizarre, inhumane and abusive way that the White House is expanding its power over the American people.

It's not an extremist belief or theory of the far Right. It's a fact that has been confirmed by publications such as the New York Times, the Washington Post, MSNBC and even documented by the far-Left blog,

Two more reasons to just say no to Kagan confirmation

First, C. Everett Koop chimes in and recommends a "no" vote due mainly to her :

Former Surgeon General C. Everett Koop has written an extensive letter to members of the Senate calling for a no vote on the Supreme Court nomination of Elena Kagan. The letter focuses attention on the Clinton administration memos Kagan authored showing her attempting to manipulate abortion opinion.

Specifically, Koop refers to the ways in which Kagan influenced the language of a 1997 statement by American College of Obstetrics and Gynecologists on partial-birth abortions.

Whereas ACOG found no occasion in which the three-day-long abortion procedure is medically necessary for women, Kagan pressured ACOG to include language saying there may be instances where it is and the Supreme Court eventually relied on that language to overturn state bans on the abortion procedure.

That eventually kept partial-birth abortions legal for several years longer until the Supreme Court reversed itself when considering a national ban Congress approved with medical findings that partial-birth abortions are medically unnecessary.

In his letter, Koop calls "unethical" and "disgraceful" Kagan's effort to persuade the medical group to change its expert opinion to conform to her political demands.

"She was willing to replace a medical statement with a political statement that was not supported by any existing medical data," writes Koop.

"Kagan's political language, a direct result of the amendment she made to ACOG's Policy Statement, made its way into American jurisprudence and misled federal courts for the next decade," he said.

He condemns Kagan for having “manipulated the medical policy statement on partial-birth abortion of a major medical organization.”

Second is her promotion of Shariah while at Harvard:

Oakland PD eliminates 80 officer positions and asks residents not to report crimes

Yikes!  In order to help make up for a $32.5 million funding shortfall, to eliminate 80 police officers from the payroll.  An additional 122 may be canned by year end.  On top of that, there are 44 situations that the police will no longer respond to.  If you are a criminal, you now have a laundry list of crimes you can officially get away with.

I feel for those who live in or around Oakland, CA.  I used to live about 45 minutes from there and have driven through it many times.  At least the residents there can protect themselves and their possessions.  Oh wait, this is .  And . Nevermind.  Sad

Here's a partial list:

  • burglary
  • theft
  • embezzlement
  • grand theft
  • grand theft:dog
  • identity theft
  • false information to peace officer
  • required to register as sex or arson offender
  • dump waste or offensive matter
  • discard appliance with lock
  • loud music
  • possess forged notes
  • pass fictitious check
  • obtain money by false voucher
  • fraudulent use of access cards
  • stolen license plate
  • embezzlement by an employee (over $ 400)
  • extortion
  • attempted extortion
  • false personification of other
  • injure telephone/ power line
  • interfere with power line
  • unauthorized cable tv connection
  • vandalism
  • administer/expose poison to another's

Syndicate content

by Dr. Radut